| |
| |  | Digital Camera Accessories | Home » » » Raynox HD-7000 Pro 0.7x High Definition Wideangle Lens for Camcorders with a 58mm Filter Thread | | | | | | | Product Details: | | | Product Weight:
| 0.69 pounds | | Package Length:
| 4.4 inches | | Package Width:
| 4.4 inches | | Package Height:
| 4.2 inches | | Package Weight:
| 0.9 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 7 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 ( 7 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
15 of 17 found the following review helpful:
 Apples to orangesApr 27, 2006
By Jim Krupnik
"jkrupnik"
I just wanted to point out that the HD-7000 is not in the same class as the lenses mentioned in the unfavorable review above. I have not used the above mentioed lenses, but the response from Raynox indicates that they were mismatched, and/or outdated for the the application the reviewer had in mind. No matter, as neither lens mentioned in the negative review is an HD-7000, and this space is for reviews of the HD-7000. Who knows, maybe the root problem reported was with the camera focusing system after all.
I bought an HD-7000 for my Canon S2 IS just a short time ago. It seemed to offer higher quality specs than the Canon glass that is available for the S2, although it is quite a bit larger a chunk of glass. So far, I cannot complain at all. It operates across the entire zoom range, is sharp as a tack, and records high quality, contrasty images. In other words, for a conversion lens meant to attach to a digicam that currently retails for less than three hundred fifty bucks, it produces spectacular images. Pretty much awesome, actually. Then again, at the current price, the Canon S2 IS itself is more than awesome. Buy one and be stupid silly happy with your ability to sniff out the best digital value on the planet today. No kidding, it's that good.
The downside of this lens is that it is HUGE. It looks impressive, and records impressive images, but it blocks a good portion of the built in flash on a camera like the S2. Since it doesn't stop down the prime lens at all, it can deliver terrific non flash indoor photos, but if you need flash (and you will), I suggest that you use an accessory flash unit when the 7000 is mounted, so much of the flash energy doesn't just hit the backside of the conversion lens. Of course, even the Canon conversion tele and wide lenses have similar limitations, but I thought you should know up front that you will be looking for an accessory flash unit before long if you use such lenses on a regular basis.
The bottom line is that Raynox builds high quality lenses that offer greater value than most camera manufacturers offerings. Just make sure that that your intended application fits the design of the lens before you buy. Trying to fit a round peg into a square hole after the fact in an effort to save a few bucks is an excercise in frustration. The Raynox website provides plenty of camera specific info, so you should have no trouble at all.
Raynox products are of very high quality, and their best offerings cost little more than the middle quality offerings of other manufacturers. Spend a few extra bucks on the top line Raynox products, and you will still save money overall, and be very happy with the result.
5 of 5 found the following review helpful:
 Good Lens For the PriceJan 23, 2010
By metamorphis8
I purchased this lens recently for use with a Canon HFS100. I use the camera frequently for recording family, so often we are indoors and require the additional field of view. In that department, the Raynox is quite satisfactory, though I often wish it would offer a slightly wider field of view than .7X. There is a clear increase in the field of view, and one wishes that Canon would incorporate that into its optics for a camera at this lofty price.
In bright sunlight, this lens shows its limitations. There is noticeable lens reflection which is not present when using the camera without the Raynox. There is also some barrel distortion present. Upon reviewing some of the footage on my computer, the reflections and barrel distortion were obvious. On the other hand, in situations without bright, direct light, the lens appears to capture HD quality footage on par with the built in lens. The build quality appears good, and the color matches the camera. It is heavy, however, and significantly increases the length and weight of the camera. That's also a positive thing, because it balances the BP827 battery on the back, and its extra weight stabilizes the camera in hand. Given that the lens is less than half the price of Canon's converter, it is not a bad bargain. If shooting in tight places this lens is a good addition.
3 of 3 found the following review helpful:
Great Lens - Used as intendedFeb 06, 2010
By A. Heline
I purchased the HD-7000 Pro as a Wide Angle ADAPTER (not a primary lens for a SLR) lens to my Canon S5 IS camera, augmenting the built in lens. So far, after a couple months of use, the pictures have been clear and crisp, with no more distortion than can be expected with any wide angle lens, or adapter. In-fact, I also own a Raynox DCR-730 and there is less edge distortion on the HD-7000 Pro optics. For the Canon S5, I have semi-permanently mounted the HD-7000 Pro to a metal 58mm adapter mount, for rapid lens change.
The lens has 58mm threads on the camera mount side and 82mm female threads for filters. Being of the old school of protecting the lens, a Hoya 82mm UV filter is semi-permanently mounted to the front end. The lens ships with a slide-on lens cap and a mounting thread slide-on cap for protection. It also ships with a 'mildly' protective cloth pouch with a draw string. The pouch is large enough to contain the lens and the metal 58mm adapter mount. A couple notes for prospective buyers, it is as large if not larger than a telephoto conversion lens (especially the Sony VCL-DH1758) and fills the camera bag rapidly, but well worth carrying. And, for built-in flash users; it is so huge, only about a fifth of your flash will get to the subject.
Personally and in my opinion, the lens is great - used as intended - as an adapter lens. It is well built but still requires care in handling. It is a lens, not a super-ball; not built for bouncing off of concrete.
5 of 6 found the following review helpful:
Works as describedNov 03, 2009
By P. Soli
I purchased this lens for my Canon HFS10. Having threads on both sides of the lens is a fantastic plus over the comparable Canon wide angle lens (which is only threaded on one side). I am able to install a UV filter to protect the Raynox lens. This is not an option on the Canon lens. You will pay top dollar and can't add a filter for protection? Seems a little silly, but maybe it reduces flare.
I am not a professional videographer, but I understand quality and value. This lens has it! Don't worry about "compromising" if you buy this lens. Purchasing another brand for more money is a waste in my opinion unless your a professional. You will get what you pay for...and then some with the Raynox. I cannot see any flaws in my video or still photos, the images are flawless and much W I D E R!
I saved enough money on the wide angle lens, I was able to purchase the external flash and a Stik tripod. I still spent less money if I just purchased the Canon lens.
A few notes: please be aware you WILL need a remote flash installed atop of the camera. If you do not add the shoe flash/video light, the pictures and videos will have a round shadow casting on your subjects (because some of the light from the built-in flash/video light is blocked by the wider lens). You will have the same problem with the Canon!
Also, be aware of the "flare". Look up flare on the internet to learn about optics and directional lighting. I have added a lens hood and the flare is reduced. Just be aware of your lighting conditions; something you should do anyway if you want to have good video.
I am completely satisfied with this product and you should be too. There is ZERO distortion. Good luck!
-PD
Good bang for the buck.Oct 31, 2011
By megazone23
For the price, it's not a bad lens at all (for camcorders). I've used it on a Canon Vixia HFS100, HFM31 (step up ring), HFM40 (step up ring) and it's given me the extra bit that I've needed for taking videos indoors (those cameras start at a focal length of 43mm or something). I've also tried it on a HFG10 for the extra bit of wide angle on it.
Quality wise, it's not bad as the image remains quite sharp. My only concern seems to be that it gets a little bit soft when fully zoomed in (as in one of my videos... but then again, it was in low light on the M40 so it might be the camcorder itself recording in very low light Didn't look very closely on the S100 or the G10, but it seemed ok in good lighting, so it probably is the low light issue with the M40.
It does tend to flare quite easily outdoors, so be careful of those sunny days. Great buy none the less and one of the only few that works with zoom through.
See all 7 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
